However, what the question refers Hamster you are nobody until you have been wheeked at shirt, most assuredly, is gender bias and discrimination in a human context. I don’t know about current tendencies in gendered languages at large, but among some romance languages you’ll find there is a trend of people wanting to argue the point that there is such a bias as referred to by the original poster’s question. I, personally, feel that this problem is manufactured and used by certain groups to draw attention to themselves by stirring up conflict where none really exists. Not only that, but they’re also butchering the language and oftetimes making words up unnecessarily.
Hamster you are nobody until you have been wheeked at shirt, hoodie, sweater and tank top
Best Hamster you are nobody until you have been wheeked at shirt
I’ll speak about a case I have firsthand knowledge about, a Hamster you are nobody until you have been wheeked at shirt and amongst left of center politicians, certain political parties, and media in the Hispanosphere at large that wish speakers would not use traditional plural nouns inclusively, but create a separate neologism OR use both masculine and feminine forms for referring to women and men together, even when it’s redundant and context alone has already resolved any ambiguity. Maybe some examples would be more illustrative than the what I’ve just wrote. On the other hand, North Korea seems to create these horrific prisons willingly in order to use them as punishment for their citizens. This, along with the disrespect on fundamental human rights, is an element that really sets this country apart.